Allowed

Sokha Majhi Alias Bharmu Manjhi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC17 Oct 2023B.A./9429/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi, enlarged the applicant, Sokha Majhi, on bail in connection with the Nimdih P.S. Case No.51 of 2022 for offences under the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, considering the period of custody and submission of a full FIR without suppression.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandil.

Sokha Majhi Alias Bharmu Manjhi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

- 1 -

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.9429 of 2023

¶3

Sokha Majhi @ Bharmu Manjhi …… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand

¶6

…... Opp. Party

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶8

--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. C.G.A. Bardhan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P ---------

¶9

02/Dated: 17th October, 2023

¶10

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State

¶11

2. The applicant, who is in custody since 03.11.2022, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Nimdih P.S. Case No.51 of 2022, corresponding to G.R. No.42 of 2023.

¶12

3. It appears that the applicant has been made accused for committing the offence under Sections 12/ 15 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act.

¶13

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that complete set of F.I.R along with its enclosures have been annexed with the present bail application and there is no suppression on his part.

¶14

Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

¶15

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶16

6. Considering the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandil, in connection with Nimdih P.S. Case No.51 of 2022, corresponding to G.R. No.42 of 2023, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶17

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶18

Chandan/-

Sokha Majhi Alias Bharmu Manjhi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sokha Majhi Alias Bharmu Manjhi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahdev Karmakar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Singo Hembram Vs Sri Prashant Kumar the Administrator Subernrekha Project

Dinesh Singh Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bijay Kumar Vs the Chief Executive Officer Indian Bank

Anil Bara Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jagdeo Prasad Vs The Vice Chancellor Vinobha Bhave University And Ors.