The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an interlocutory application for condonation of a 7-day delay and an application for restoration of a first appeal to its original file, satisfying the reasons assigned by the petitioner.
Condonation of delay of 7 days; restoration of First Appeal No. 66 of 2022 to original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C. M. P. No. 848 of 2022
Reema Devi … … Petitioner
Versus Amit Kumar … … Respondent ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Verma, Advocate : For the Respondent
3/04.05.2023 I. A. No. 3819 of 2023:
Heard Mr. Anuj Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
This interlocutory application has been preferred for condonation
of delay of 7 days in filing this civil miscellaneous petition.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 7 days in filing this civil miscellaneous petition is hereby condoned.
I. A. No. 3819 of 2023 stands disposed of.
C. M. P. No. 848 of 2022:
This application has been preferred by the petitioner for restoration of F. A. No. 66 of 2022 which stood dismissed for noncompliance of the order dated 27.09.2022.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the same, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed and F. A. No. 66 of 2022 is restored to its original file.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
R Shekhar Cp 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the interlocutory application can be condoned.
Whether the first appeal stands restored to original file.
Whether the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
Reema Devi
Amit Kumar
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court