Allowed

Nankuli Chaudhary v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC24 Apr 2023B.A./784/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to the applicant in Danda P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 for cheating, forging documents, and criminal conspiracy. Released on ₹10,000 bond with conditions to report and maintain active mobile.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to reporting to police and submitting Aadhaar/mobile details.

Nankuli Chaudhary Vs the State of Jharkhand — Money Laundering | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.784 of 2023

¶2

¶3

Nankuli Chaudhary @ Nanhkuli Chaudhary

¶4

…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Adv. For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P.

¶5

¶6

06/Dated: 24^th April, 2023

¶7

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 04.11.2022 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Danda P.S. Case No.20 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.1266 of 2017, registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Garhwa.

¶8

3. It appears that the applicant is made accused for syphoning the money meant for the beneficiary and they are middle men.

¶9

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.

¶10

5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that some of similarly situated co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

¶11

6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Garhwa in connection with Danda P.S. Case No.20 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.1266 of 2017, subject to condition that the applicant will keep on reporting to the concerned police station during the pendency of the trial. Further, the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶12

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶13

Amar/-

Nankuli Chaudhary v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nankuli Chaudhary v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Mafazzal Hussain Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pakila Tudu Alias Bale Tudu Alias Bala Biti Tudu Alias Pakela Alias Bale Alias Bale Biti Tudu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Safikul Seikh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ram Sewak Chaudhary Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chinku Singh Alias Chintu Kumar Alias Chintu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vikash Kumar Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand