Allowed

MD Mustakim Alias Bablu v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC4 Oct 2023B.A./6114/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted regular bail to the applicant in a trial involving forgery and cheating offences. The order imposes conditions including a specific bond amount, requirement for close relative surety, and monthly police station reporting.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding Aadhaar, mobile number, and monthly police reporting.

MD Mustakim Alias Bablu Vs the State of Jharkhand — Corruption | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

B.A. No.6114 of 2023

¶3

Md. Mustakim @ Bablu … …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … …Opp. Party(s)

¶4

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶5

--For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Anand Kr. Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.D. Munda, A.P.P. --: Heard the parties.

¶6

05/04.10.2023:

¶7

The applicant, who is in custody since 03.08.2022, has renewed his prayer for regular bail in connection with S.T. No.125 of 2023 arising out of Sidhgora P.S. Case No.118 of 2022 for the offence u/s 399, 402, 467, 468, 472, 473, 420 and 120B IPC and Section 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶8

Earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant(s) has been rejected vide order dated 13.02.2023 passed in B.A. No.11301 of 2022.

¶9

Innocence has been claimed and participation in the trial has been assured. It has been submitted that charge has already been framed. On the above facts, prayer for bail has been renewed.

¶10

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶11

Considering the nature of the offence and the fact that charge has already been framed but till date not a single witness has been examined, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant (s) on bail. Accordingly, the applicant(s), above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur, in connection with S.T. No.125 of 2023 on the condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶12

Further condition is that one of the bailors will be the close relative and the applicant (s) is directed to report once in a month before the concerned police station.

¶13

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶14

Ravi/-

MD Mustakim Alias Bablu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Mustakim Alias Bablu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Asin Parwez Vs the State of Jharkhand

Satendra Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chota Maisa Paharia Alias Chhota Maisha Pahariya Vs the State of Jharkhand

Richard Wilson Tigga Alias Richard Tigga Vs the State of Jharkhand