Petitioner Umesh Prasad sought and obtained permission to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. The court accorded permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5091 of 2022
------
Umesh Prasad .... …. Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Anita Devi .... .... ....Opposite Parties
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Rajiv Kr. Karan, Advocate
------
Order No. 08 Dated- 20.03.2023
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this
court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.S./-
Umesh Prasad
The State of Jharkhand
Anita Devi
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
