The petitioner sought withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application. The learned Appropriate Prosecution Prosecutor had no objection. The court dismissed the bail application on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3689 of 2023
Deepak Kumar .... .… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opp. Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND -------For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Spl. P.P. --------
Order No. 04/ dated 25.08.2023
After advancing some argument, learned Counsel for
the petitioner has submitted that he wants to withdraw this Anticipatory Bail Application.
Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
P.K.S.
Deepak Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
