In a bail petition, this court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing surrender within six weeks and fixing conditions regarding deposit, sureties, and cooperation with investigation.
The petitioner is directed to surrender, deposit cash security, furnish bail bond with sureties, and cooperate with investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3438 of 2023
------
Yashoda Devi
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Swami N. Pd. Rai, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P
Order No.03 Dated- 06/10/2023
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Devipur P.S. Case No.06 of 2023 instituted under Sections 452, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and Dinesh Yadav and caused injuries to them. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that because of some petty dispute, the occurrence took place. It is further submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not disturb or annoy the informant or the injured/victim in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash
security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Deoghar in connection with Devipur P.S. Case No.06 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not disturb or annoy the informant or the injured/victim in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioner accused under the Indian Penal Code apprehending arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yashoda Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
