Rajendra Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge permitted withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application and consequently dismissed the same.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the application grante
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2883 of 2023
------
Rajendra Prasad .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Akhauri Awinash Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Adv. Mr. R.N. Chatterjee, Adv.
------
Order No.07 Dated- 26.07.2023
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajendra Prasad
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./2883/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court