Petitioner applied for anticipatory bail but sought to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application granted; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1629 of 2023
Sohrai Mahto … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.P. Jha, Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.07 Dated- 14.09.2023
Heard the parties.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sonu/Gunjan-
Sohrai Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
