Allowed

Ranjit Kumar Mishra Alias Ranjit v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC12 Sept 2023A.B.A./138/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving illegal stone storage and theft allegations, subject to cash security, a bail bond with sureties, and conditions for cooperation with investigation and appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender if he deposits Rs. 30,000/- cash security, furnishes a bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties, submits mobile number and Aadhar copy, an

Ranjit Kumar Mishra Alias Ranjit Vs the State… — Mining and Natural Resources | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 138 of 2023

¶2

Ranjit Kumar Mishra @ Ranjit … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶3

------

¶4

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------

¶6

Order No.04 Dated- 12.09.2023

¶7

Heard the parties.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Potka P.S. Case No.37 of 2022 registered under sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4/21 of MMDR Act, and under Section 7/9/13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules.

¶9

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is illegally storing stolen stone chips of 28,000 cft. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on

¶12

depositing cash security of Rs.30,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Potka P.S. Case No.37 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶14

Sonu/Gunjan-

Ranjit Kumar Mishra Alias Ranjit v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Kumar Mishra Alias Ranjit v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Paswan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anil Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bipin Kumar Bhagat Alias Bipin Bhagat Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kunj Bihari Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand

Abhijit Dutta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bijay Kumar Sinha Alias Bijay Kumar Alias Guddu Vs the State of Jharkhand