The High Court of Jharkhand refused confirmation of the antecedentsin an anticipatory bail application by permitting the petitioner to withdraw the matter with the consequent dismissal of the application.
Permission granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1280 of 2023
Vinay Kumar Yadav …… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand ……Opposite party
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ramawatar Choubey, Advocate
Order No.04/ Dated:22.03.2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.K/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
Vinay Kumar Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
