Allowed

Sumant Kumar Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Dec 2023A.B.A./1219/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order grants anticipatory bail to three applicants facing non-bailable offences under various sections of the IPC. The court noted the dispute was a family land disagreement and allowed bail subject to surrender, a bond, and specific conditions regarding communication and Aadhaar.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to surrender in four weeks, furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and specific conditions regarding Aadhaar and mobile number.

Sumant Kumar Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand — Property and Title | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1219 of 2023

¶2

¶3

Sumant Kumar Prasad @ Subham Prasad

¶4

Kunal @ Kunal Mishra

¶5

Shubhankar Mishra

¶6

…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Jharkhand

¶9

…. …. Opposite Party

¶10

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶12

¶13

For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Raj Vardhan, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.

¶14

¶15

04/Dated: 19^th December, 2023

¶16

1. Heard the parties.

¶17

2. Apprehending their arrest, the applicants have approached this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail, in connection Bagbera P.S. Case No.155 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 325, 323, 324, 326, 341, 342, 307, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.

¶18

3. It is a family dispute between the parties over a piece of land.

¶19

4. Innocence of the applicants has been claimed and undertaking has been given for co-operating with the investigating agency and participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the scuffle has taken place between the parties. Further, it has been submitted that no deadly weapon has been used. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

¶20

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶21

6. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the applicants. Accordingly, the applicants are directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, the court below shall enlarge the applicants on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No.155 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Further, the applicants will submit self-attested photocopy of their Aadhaar Cards and also submit their mobile numbers before the learned court below which they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶22

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶23

Raja / - Uploaded

Sumant Kumar Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumant Kumar Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamta Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Deepak Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rahul Kumar Alias Rahul Bhuiya Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sudhir Kumar Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Praveen Kumar Alias Pravin Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vinod Chauhan Vs the State of Jharkhand