Rahul Kumar Alias Rahul Gupta v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, accused of murder and arms offences, sought regular bail citing lack of suppression and inadmissible CCTV evidence. Court rejected bail due to possession of three pistols in confession and informant statement suggesting involvement.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for regular bail is rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 115 of 2023
....
Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Gupta .… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. J.S.Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. V.K.Tiwari, Adv. ....
The applicant who is in custody since 10.06.2022 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sidhgora P.S. Case No.91/2022, registered for the offence under Sections 147/ 148/ 149/ 452/ 427/ 307/ 324/ 302/ 506/ 34 of IPC and Sections 25(1-B)a/ 26(1)/ 27/ 35 of the Arms Act.
03/03.04.2023
The applicant is an accused of committing murder.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part .
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail in a murder case involving possession of recovered firearms.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rahul Kumar
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Rajesh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./115/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court