The High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, on the petition's request, accorded permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1149 of 2023
------
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Mahto, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No. 04 Dated- 13.03.2023
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that as the petitioner has been arrested in this case, hence, he seeks permission of this court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.S./
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be accorded to the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
Mr. Mahesh Kr. Mahto
State
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
