Anticipatory bail application dismissed because petitioner withdrew it after being arrested and no one appeared on his behalf during the hearing.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.10255 of 2022
------
Miraj Ansari .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated- 09.01.2023
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner whereas the learned Add.P.P is appearing on behalf of the State.
From perusal of the record, it appears that Bench Slip has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for withdrawal of this anticipatory bail application as petitioner has been arrested in this case.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Pappu/
Miraj Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
