Petitioners withdrew their Writ Petition as infructuous based on counteraffidavit statements; the High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI [Civil Writ Jurisdiction] W.P.(C ) No. 965 of 2020
1.Birendra Kumar 2.Manoj Kumar .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. ... ...Respondent(s)
........... CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO [Through:- Video Conferencing] ......... For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate For the respondents/State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA.III
03/ 09.03.2022 . Mr. Vikesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on the instruction of Mr. A. K. Sahani learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant Writ Petition, as the same has become infructuous in view of the statements made in Paras 10 & 11 of the counteraffidavit.
Learned counsel for the State, Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA.III has no objection. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
( Kailash Prasad Deo, J. )
Sandeep/
Birendra Kumar
Manoj Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
