Mazhar Alam v. District Administration
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitions were dismissed as not pressed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who submitted he had no instructions to press the matter.
The petitions were dismissed as not pressed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who submitted he had no instructions to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 7881 of 2012
Mazhar Alam
..... … Petitioner
Versus
..... … Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rituraj, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I. ------
10/ 02.12.2022 Mr. Ayush Aditya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that he has no instruction to press this petition.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no objection.
As such, this petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
Mazhar Alam
The State of Jharkhand
Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh
The Additional Collector, Hazaribag
The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribag
The Circle Officer, Ramgarh
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court