Disposed

Ishaque Ansari Alias Ishaque Miyan v. the State of Jharkhand Represented through Secretary Land Revenue Registration and Land Reforms

Jharkhand HC3 Jan 2022WPC/2303/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Ranchi disposed of a writ petition challenging the inclusion of land in the prohibited list. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Deputy Commissioner to seek exclusion of the specific plot, directing a decision within six weeks after a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa; decision to be taken after hearing within six weeks.

Ishaque Ansari Alias Ishaque Miyan Vs the State of… — Land Acquisition | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2303 of 2021

¶3

Ishaque Ansari @ Ishaque Miyan

¶4

… … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand represented through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand

¶7

The Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa

¶8

The Additional Collector, Garhwa

¶9

The District Sub-Registrar, Registration Office, Garhwa

¶10

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Garhwa

¶11

The Circle Officer, Meral, District- Garhwa

¶12

…. … Respondents

¶13

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶14

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, A.C. to S.C.-V

¶15

¶16

Order No. 04 Dated: 03.01.2022

¶17

The present case is taken up through video conferencing.

¶18

2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the present writ petition confines the prayer made in the same to the extent of issuance of direction upon the respondents to take decision for excluding the land appertaining to plot no. 785, khata no. 22, villageGobardaha, Circle- Meral, District- Garhwa measuring an area of 0.77 acre from the list of prohibited land as according to the petitioner, he has lawful right and possession over the same and the rent of which is regularly being paid to the state government.

¶19

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per notification no. 585 dated 10.10.2019 issued by the Government of Jharkhand through the Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, if any plot is required to be taken out of the list of prohibited land, the Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district is the competent authority for the said purpose.

¶20

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of aforesaid prayer made by the petitioner, he is given liberty to file representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa (the respondent no.2) on the present issue. On receipt of the said representation, the respondent no. 2 after providing due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, shall take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within six weeks from the date of filing of the said representation.

¶21

5. The writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty and direction.

¶22

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶23

Ritesh/

Ishaque Ansari Alias Ishaque Miyan v. the State of Jharkhand Represented through Secretary Land Revenue Registration and Land Reforms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ishaque Ansari Alias Ishaque Miyan v. the State of Jharkhand Represented through Secretary Land Revenue Registration and Land Reforms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sitaram Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bhagirath Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand through Its Chief Secretary

MD Rakib Sheikh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Raj Kumar Jaiswal Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Department of Transport

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Represented through Its Divisional Manager Jamil Akhtar Vs the State of Jharkhand through Pr Secretary Department of Labour Employment and Training

Meghnath Saha Vs the State of Jharkhand