Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to agitate the issue before the appropriate forum. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to plead elsewhere.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to agitate the issue before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
[Civil Writ Jurisdiction]
W.P.(C ) No. 2026 of 2019
Mathur Das & Anr. .... .. ... Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. ... ...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO ......... For the Petitioners : Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, Advocate For the respondents-State : Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to S.C.-VII
07/ 14.03.2022 .
Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition to agitate the issue before the appropriate forum.
Learned counsel for the respondents- State, Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to S.C.VII has submitted that counter-affidavit has been filed in this case on 18.03.2020.
Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to agitate the issue before the appropriate forum.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
R.S.
Mathur Das & Anr.
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
