This order lists the parties and bench in an appeal arising from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The appellant requested leave to withdraw the appeal. Leave was granted and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 353 of 2020
Sr. Prasanna CSST, aged about 64 years, Daugher of K.M. Thomas, Permanent Address-Head Office of Northern Province of Camelite Sisters of St. Teresa, St. Teresa Provincial House, Misrod, Bhopal, PO Bhopal, PS Misrod, Dist-Bhopal, State Madhya Pradesh
... ... ... ... Appellant
Versus
1.Arbind Kumar, aged about 55 year son of Late Basudeo Prasad Sah, resident of Mohalla-Quarterpara, PO-Dumka, PS-Dumka (T), District-Dumka (Jharkhand)
2.Harold Anand Kumar Mundle, aged about 80 years, son of Late N.K. Mundle, resident of H-43, Argora Housing Colony, P.O. & P.SArgora, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) … ... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Appellant : Mr. Shobha Gloria Lakra, Advocate ---------
Oral Order 03/Dated:16.11.2022
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that since the writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the present appeal would not be maintainable and as such, the appellant wants to withdraw the appeal.
Leave is granted.
In the result, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.)
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
APK/Saket
Sr. Prasanna CSST
Arbind Kumar
Harold Anand Kumar Mundle
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
