High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a criminal revision application as abated, recording that the petitioner died on 04.01.2011, returning the LCR to the concerned court.
Criminal revision application dismissed as abated; LCR sent back to the court concerned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 992 of 2004
Dudnath Chauhan @ Sitaram Singh
Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. ….Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
------For the Petitioner :None For the Opposite Party :Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, APP
04/21.06.2022 Pursuant to the order dated 30.03.2022, notice was issued to the petitioner. A service report has been received indicating therein that the petitioner has died on 04.1.2011 itself and the copy of death certificate has also been annexed with the report.
In view of the aforesaid fact, the instant criminal revision application stands dismissed as abated.
Let the LCR be sent back to the court concerned
forthwith.
Fahim /-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision applicant can be prosecuted after death.
Dudnath Chauhan @ Sitaram Singh
The State of Jharkhand
DEEPAK ROSHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
