The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a criminal revision application as withdrawn upon the submission that the petitioner had died, with no objection from the opposite parties.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No.74 of 2004
Madan Lal Rawani
….. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .….. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioners :Mr. Prabhash Chandra Jha, Adv. For the Opp. Party-State :Ms. P. Shrestha, APP
05/21.04.2022 Mr. Prabhash Chandra Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner has died; as such he seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision application.
2. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties does not have any objection.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant criminal revision, is hereby, dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Let the LCR be sent to the court concerned forthwith.
( Deepak Roshan, J.)
Fahim/-
Madan Lal Rawani
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
