A single judge, noting lack of instruction from the petitioner, dismissed the criminal revision for non-prosecution but directed the lower court to comply with a prior order and submit a report.
Revision dismissed for non-prosecution; lower court directed to submit report complying with order dated 28.09.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No.243 of 2017
Md. Aslam ... Petitioner -Versus1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Taranum Pravin … Opposite Parties ---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
------For the Petitioner : Mr. Navin Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Special .P.P. --------- Order No.07 Dated 25th August, 2022
Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the State.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no instruction in this case.
Under the circumstances, this Criminal Revision No.243 of 2017 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
However, learned Court below is directed to comply with the order dated 28.09.2021 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and submit his report.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Court below by ‘FAX’.
( Sanjay Prasad, J .)
Raja/-
Md. Aslam
The State of Jharkhand
Taranum Pravin
SANJAY PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
