Permission to withdraw the criminal revision is granted upon the consent of the State; the revision is dismissed accordingly as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 241 of 2020 Sidheswar Prasad @ Singeshwar Prasad … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. ---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
--- 05/24.02.2022: Learned counsel for the revisionist seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision. Permission is granted. Counsel for the State has no objection. This criminal revision is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/-
Sidheswar Prasad @ Singeshwar Prasad
The State of Jharkhand
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
