The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a criminal revision as abated. The judgment notes that a report confirmed both petitioners have died.
The application was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 1094 of 2008
1.Satrughan Pandit. 2.Sri Nath Pandit. ..… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand. ..... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, APP ---------
07/Dated: 9th November, 2022
Pursuant to the order dated 02.09.2022 notices were issued to the petitioners intimating them about the pendency of this case. A report has been received indicating therein that both the petitioners have died.
Amardeep/
Satrughan Pandit
Sri Nath Pandit
The State of Jharkhand
Deeprak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
