The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed this criminal revision as abated because the parties involved had died.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1065 of 2008
Bijawa Devi @ Bijua Devi ….. Petitioner Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Gopal Krishna Sinha, Advocate Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate
08/ 01.11.2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Pursuant to the order dated 31.08.2022 notices were
issued to the petitioner as well as O.P. No.2 informing them about the pendency of this case. As per the report, both the petitioner and the O.P. No.2 have died.
3. In view of the aforesaid fact, the instant criminal revision application is dismissed as abated.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Pramanik/
Bijawa Devi @ Bijua Devi
State of Jharkhand
Durga Gope @ Durga Yadav
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court