Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The court, in view of the A.P.P.'s lack of objection, accorded such permission and dismissed the petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition and I.A. dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 617 of 2015
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party-State : Mrs. Vandan Bharti, A.P.P. -----
03/14.02.2022. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and
Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. for the State.
This petition has been taken through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has got no objection.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequently, I.A. No.4506 of 2015 also stands dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
Bidyutwati Devi @ Putul
Rajesh Bariyar
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
