The petitioner submitted that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with. The High Court disposed of the continuing writ case based on this submission.
The continuing writ case (Civil Application) stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 395 of 2021 Syed Kafil Ahmad ….. Petitioner
Versus
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate For the State : Ms. Shrestha Mehta, AC to SC-II For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate
10/ 24.06.2022 Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied, as such the case may be disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Pramanik/
Syed Kafil Ahmad
The State of Jharkhand
Sri Vinay Kumar
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
