The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application without expressing any view on merits, noting no arrest apprehension as only summons were issued. The court directed the trial court to follow Supreme Court guidelines if the petitioner surrenders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.898 of 2022
------ Kaldip Singh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand .... .... 2. Rajvinder Singh ....Opposite Parties
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. R.R. Ravi Das, Addl.P.P For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Adv.
------
Order No.06 Dated- 05.08.2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No. 128 of 2021 instituted under Sections 420, 406, 457, 341, 323, 504, 506/380 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the charge-sheet has already been submitted in court and cognizance has been taken against the petitioner by concerned court. It further appears that petitioner has co-operated with the investigation of the case and after cognizance, summons was issued against the petitioner.
In the light of facts and circumstances of this case, and as per the guidelines of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in 2021(10) SCC 773 . It appears that there is no apprehension regarding the arrest of petitioner, since only summons has been issued against him. Hence, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
IN case of surrender and seeking regular bail by the petitioner, the concerned court is directed to follow the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. ( supra ) and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Pappu/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.Referred¶12
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. 2021(10) SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Kaldip Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Rajvinder Singh
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
