Mangaram Swarnkar Alias Magaram v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a bail application that was not pressed by the petitioners. No legal issue or substantive question was decided.
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a bail application that was not pressed by the petitioners. No legal issue or substantive question was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4829 of 2022
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ……Opposite party
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P.
Order No.04/ Dated:17.08.2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant bail application.
Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.K.
Mangaram Swarnkar @ Magaram
Kalyani Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court