Allowed

Devan Yadav Alias Devan Jadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC8 Feb 2022A.B.A./472/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing allegations of involvement in illicit country-made liquor. Bail was conditional on security and cooperation with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Pratappur P.S. Case No. 191 of 2021 on furnishing security and ensuring appearance as noticed by the Investigating Officer.

Devan Yadav Alias Devan Jadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 472 of 2022

¶3

Devan Yadav @ Devan Jadav … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶6

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Pallava ,Adv. For the State : Mr. B.N.Ojha ,Addl. P.P.

¶8

02 / 08.02.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after resumption of the court in physical mode.

¶10

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the present.

¶11

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pratappur P.S. Case No. 191 of 2021 registered under Sections 272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47 (a) of Excise Act.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is involved in the preparation of illicit country made liquor. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶13

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing cash security of Rs. 3,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, chatra in connection with Pratappur P.S. Case No. 191 of 2021 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶15

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶16

Smita/-

Devan Yadav Alias Devan Jadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devan Yadav Alias Devan Jadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunny Kumar Alias Ankit Ekka Vs the State of Jharkhand

Geeta Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nakul Mandal Alias Nakul Kumar Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sudhir Murmu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shekh Kabir Ulla Khan Alias Babu Alias Shekh Kabir Ullah Khan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Touhid Sk Alias MD Tohid Saikh Vs the State of Jharkhand