The Court held that the civil miscellaneous petition under Article 227 was not maintainable as the petitioner had an available statutory remedy of revision. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
The civil miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C. M. P. No. 356 of 2022
Abul Hassan
… …. Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Parwez Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Achyut Keshav, Advocate
Oral Order
03 / Dated : 09.11.2022
Under the circumstance, this civil misc. petition is dismissed.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
AKT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil miscellaneous petition under Article 227 is maintainable when the petitioner has a statutory remedy of revision under the eviction control Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sameer Singh and another Vs. Abdul Rab and othersExplained¶17
(2015) 1 SCC 379 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abul Hassan
State of Jharkhand
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
