Allowed

Hajrat Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC4 Feb 2022A.B.A./306/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand considered the application for anticipatory bail filed by Hajrat Ansari. Despite prior rejections, the court, noting fresh grounds and similar cases, granted anticipatory bail with conditions to surrender and furnish a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender within four weeks and enlarge on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Hajrat Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 306 of 2022

¶3

¶4

Hajrat Ansari. .….. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Jharkhand. …. Opposite Party

¶7

Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Special P.P. --------

¶9

02/4-2-2022

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mirzachouki P.S.

¶13

Case No. 113 of 2019.

¶14

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court in A.B.A. No. 2202 of 2020. Subsequently the petitioner had once again moved this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.7551 2020, which however was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 18.2.2021.

¶15

The allegations reveal that the villagers had disclosed about the petitioner and other accused persons being involved in running crusher machine illegally.

¶16

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that some of the similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No.4268 of 2020 and in A.B.A. No. 3290 of 2021.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

On consideration of the fresh grounds, which has been enumerated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

The petitioner, named above, is accordingly directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on his surrender/arrest, he will be enlarged on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- ( Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Sahebganj in connection with Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 113 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

This application stands allowed.

¶21

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)

¶22

Rakesh/-

Hajrat Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hajrat Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Bauri Vs the State of Jharkhand

Santosh Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pradeep Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bartu Bhuinya Vs the State of Jharkhand

Hemlal Kisku Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jadu Munda Alias Budu Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand