The High Court of Jharkhand allowed a C.M.P. filed for restoration of W.P. [C] No.5397 of 2004. As the State failed to file a response within the time allowed for the C.M.P., the petition was restored to its file.
C.M.P. No. 20 of 2022 allowed and W.P. [C] No.5397 of 2004 restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI [Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction]
C.M.P. No. 20 of 2022
Siya Ram Singh
.... .. ... Petitioner(s)
Versus .. ... ...Opp. Party(s)
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
For the Petitioner : Mr. D. K. Dubey, Advocate For the Opp. Party /State : Mr. Deepankar, AC to AG
05/ 08.07.2022 .
It appears that the instant C.M.P. has been filed after about 11 years for restoration of Writ Petition i.e. W.P. [C] No.5397 of 2004.
Vide order dated 24.06.2022, Mr. Deepankar, learned AC to AG for the State has taken time to file response, but no response has been filed.
Considering the same, the aforesaid C. M. P. stands allowed.
Consequently, Writ Petition vide W.P. [C] No.5397 of 2004 is restored to its original file.
( Kailash Prasad Deo, J. )
Sandeep/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the C.M.P. filed for restoration of a writ petition that lapsed due to non-filing of answer within the prespective time limit should be allowed.
Siya Ram Singh
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
