The bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed as it was voluntarily withdrawn by the counsel without any objection from the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1833 of 2022 Chandra Shekhar @ Chandra Shekhar Lodha …. ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opp. Party CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishu Ranjan Advocate For the State : Md. Hatim, A.P.P.
3/27.06.2022 Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he wants to withdraw this bail application.
Learned A. P.P has not raised any objection.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn..
(SUBHASH CHAND, J.)
tarun
Chandra Shekhar @ Chandra Shekhar Lodha
The State of Jharkhand
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
