Amit Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the petitioner's application for reconsideration of anticipatory bail. The court held that earlier rejection was valid due to serious allegations, requirement of custodial interrogation, and the petitioner's lack of cooperation with the investigation.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail is rejected for the same reasons as mentioned in the earlier order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1124 of 2022
------
Amit Kumar .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
- The State of Jharkhand 2. Ruchi Singh @ Kumari Ruchi Singh ........ .... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P.
Order No.02 Dated- 24.02.2022
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after resumption of the court in physical mode.
In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in light of the serious allegations and lack of prior cooperation with investigation.
Whether fresh grounds exist to reconsider the earlier rejection order dated 13.08.2018.
Whether the petitioner's failure to cooperate with the investigation warrants rejection of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amit Kumar
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
- respondent
Ruchi Singh @ Kumari Ruchi Singh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./1124/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court