The petitioner, who had been arrested, sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1055 of 2022
Nishant Kuamr Bharti @ Chunna Mandal … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Aashish Kumar ,Adv. For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay,Addl. P.P.
02 / 22.02.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned Addl. PP submits that the petitioner has
been arrested.
On this, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Nishant Kuamr Bharti
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
