Shekhar Mandal v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under sections 419, 420 IPC, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected the prayer, holding that the petitioner was not inclined to grant bail given the facts and circumstances of the case involving impersonation and cheating.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected and the petitioner remains in custody.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10130 of 2021
Shekhar Mandal
… … Petitioner - Versus -
The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
For Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. S. K. Tiwari, A.P.P
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
05/19.01.2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office in due course.
Petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.39 of 2021, registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Deoghar.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted bail in a case involving cheating and forgery with forgery of bank official.
Whether the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shekhar Mandal
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Ambuj Nath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./10130/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court