Single judge order dismissing a writ petition not pressed by counsel who stated lack of contact with the client.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 7786 of 2013
Umesh Nath Tiwari ……… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Rakesh Shahi, Advocate
15/01.03.2021 The matter has been taken up through video conferencing.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he is not in touch with his client, therefore, he is not pressing the instant writ petition.
In view thereof, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Rohit/-
Umesh Nath Tiwari
The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary of State of Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ranchi
The Circle Officer, Sadar, Ranchi
The Circle Officer, Nagari Ranchi
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court