Be that as it may, having gone through the fair submissions of the parties, this Court is of the considered view that since the grievances of the petitioner No.1 has already been redressed and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated by this Court. So far as petitioner No.2 is concerned, already the impugned order has been quashed and set aside by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 4791 of 2016 and other analogous cases and already a decision has been taken by the respondents in view of the order passed by this Hon’ble Court and same has also been approved by the Cabinet and a Notification to that effect is likely to be issued regarding to the remaining teachers, this Court thinks it appropriate to direct the petitioner No.2 to file a fresh representation before the respondents to fix his salary from the date of his initial date of appointment, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the respondent-Director Secondary Education take a decision on the representation of the petitioner No.2 and fix and pay the salary of the Petitioner No.2 from the date of his initial date of appointment, taking into consideration the fact that the impugned order/letter has already been quashed and set aside by this Court, within a further period of six weeks.
