Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4119 of 2017
Manish Construction, Ranchi through its partner Mahesh Kumar
… … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Imam, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Manav Poddar, AC to AAG-I For the Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Shivam Singh, AC to Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
-----
08/26.02.2021 The present writ petition is taken up today through Video conferencing.
Mr. Zaid Imam, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Mr. Manav Poddar, AC to AAG-I appearing on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. Shivam Singh, AC to Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, have no objection to the same.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Manish
Manish Construction, Ranchi
The State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand State Rural Road Development Authority
The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department
The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department
The Assistant Engineer, Rural Development Department
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
