The single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioners with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. No legal principles were expounded.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
(Civil Writ Jurisdiction)
W.P.(C) No. 307 of 2011
….....
Budhani Mahatain & Others …. ..... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
…. ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
(Through : Video Conferencing)
…......... For the Petitioners : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priyanka Boby, A.C. to G.A.-I. ........
18/02.09.2021.
Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Prashant Pallav and learned counsel for the State, Ms. Priyanka Boby, A.C. to G.A.-I
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that to avail the legal remedy under the law, the petitioners seek to withdraw this writ petition.
Learned counsel for the State, Ms. Priyanka Boby, A.C. to G.A.-I has no objection.
Considering the same, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to move before appropriate forum.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
Jay/-
Budhani Mahatain & Others
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
KAILASH PRASAD DEO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
