also submits that by way of Annexure-3, the petitioner was asked to give reply to the show-cause and by way of Annexure-4, the petitioner submitted his reply. He further submits that the said reply was found to be satisfactory and that is why the petitioner was allowed to discharge the work vide order dated 08.09.2005, contained in Annexure-5. Thereafter, the salary of the petitioner was stopped and pursuant to the order passed in W.P.(S) No. 6895 of 2005, the salary of the petitioner was released vide order dated 09.06.2006, contained in Annexure-7. He also submits that the petitioner was granted the benefit of 2nd M.A.C.P. vide order dated 31.01.2014. He further submits that vide order dated 03.03.2017 on the extent of letter dated 15.01.2003, the petitioner was again asked to give reply about his appointment and the petitioner provided the entire material with regard to his appointment by letter dated 07.03.2017, contained in Annexure-10. He further submits that on the extent of order no.74 dated 26.04.2017 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, the petitioner's service has been terminated vide order dated 27.04.2017. He further submits that without following the due process of law and without following the rule with regard to the Government employees, namely, Jharkhand Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2016, the impugned order has been passed. He also submits that the petitioner has already rendered 27 years of service and without providing the document and without providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the impugned order has been passed that too on the extent of an order passed by the High Court in which the petitioner was not the party. He also submits that if
