The petitioner sought a disposal of burden of proof., The court found that other petitioners received work orders, thereby ending the dispute, and dismissed the petition without ruling on the third petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2275 of 2020
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate
05/23.02.2021 The present writ petition is taken up today through Video conferencing.
Mr. Rahul Lamba, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on latest instruction received from them submits that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 have been issued the letters of intent as well as work orders relating to the tender in question.
The said development has been confirmed by Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the petitioner. He further submits that the tender of the petitioner no.3 has been rejected by the respondents.
In view of the said development, I do not see any reason to proceed further in the present writ petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
The petitioner no.3 is at liberty to take appropriate recourse against the rejection of its tender by the respondents.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Rohit
Bhakat Enterprise
Lokasai Fuel Station
Petro Chem Transport Co.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Regional Contract Cell, Eastern Regional Office, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Chief General Manager (Operation), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
