Disposed

Ve Commercial Vehicle Limited through Authorized Representative Laxman Singh Raghuwanshi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC5 Jan 2021WPC/1972/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court order directed the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, to expedite and dispose of pending Confiscation Appeal No. 11 of 2018 within three months. The petitioner challenged an earlier confiscation order by the Divisional Forest Officer.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2 to dispose of Confiscation Appeal No. 11 of 2018 within three months and parties to cooperate.

Ve Commercial Vehicle Limited through Authorized… — Land Acquisition | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P.(C) No. 1972 of 2020

¶4

VE Commercial Vehicle Limited through authorized representative Laxman singh Raghuwanshi ... … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand

¶7

The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh

¶8

The Divisional Forest officer (West), Hazaribagh

¶9

… …Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶11

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :- Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, G.A.-I

¶12

Order No. 03 Dated: 05.01.2021

¶13

The present case is taken up through video conferencing.

¶14

2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 2 to dispose of the Confiscation Appeal No. 11 of 2018.

¶15

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that being aggrieved with order dated 24.09.2018 passed by the Authorized Officer-cumDivisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (West), Hazaribagh (the respondent no. 3) in Confiscation Case No. 79 of 2012, it filed Confiscation Appeal No. 11 of 2018 before the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh (the respondent no. 2) which is said to be still pending.

¶16

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the aforesaid limited prayer of the petitioner raised in the present writ petition, the respondent no. 2 is directed to expedite the hearing of Confiscation Appeal No. 11 of 2018 and to dispose of the same within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order. The parties are also directed to cooperate with the respondent no. 2 in disposal of the said appeal within the time frame. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid direction.

¶17

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶18

Ritesh/

Ve Commercial Vehicle Limited through Authorized Representative Laxman Singh Raghuwanshi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ve Commercial Vehicle Limited through Authorized Representative Laxman Singh Raghuwanshi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bal Govind Modi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dashmi Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ms Maa Bhagwati Construction Represented through One of Its Partners Balraj Anand Vs the State of Jharkhand

Lal Badrinath Shahdeo Vs Revenue Department

Boulevard Enterprises through Its Partner Namely Sandeep Murarka Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bibha Singh Vs Jharkhand State Housing Board through Managing Director