Criminal appeal dismissed as withdrawn after permission was granted for withdrawal. The withdrawal order did not prejudice the appellant.
Permission to withdraw accorded; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.228 of 2021
Rohit Kumar Rajak @ Rohit Kumar … … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--For the Appellant : Mr. P.K. Rai, Adv. For the State : APP ---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
04/04.08.2021: Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this criminal appeal.
Permission is accorded.
This appeal is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
However, it is recorded that withdrawal order will not be prejudiced
to the case of the appellant.
Pending I.A., if any, stands dismissed.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi-
Rohit Kumar Rajak @ Rohit Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
