The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the withdrawal of the criminal revision application at the petitioner's request as all parties had no objection presenters
Permission accorded to withdraw the criminal revision application; it is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No.822 of 2017
Shiv Shankar Saha …. …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Reena Devi …. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
---For the Petitioner : Mr. Din Dayal Saha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, P.P. ----
04/Dated: 23rd November, 2021
1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the matter has been settled outside the court and the learned counsel does not want to pursue the present revision application and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
2. Counsel for the State and Opposite Party No.2 has no objection.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present revision application being Criminal Revision No.822 of 2017 is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Pending I.A., if any, also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Amar/-
Shiv Shankar Saha
The State of Jharkhand
Reena Devi
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
