The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition as abated because the petitioner, the sole beneficiary of the legal right, had died and his legal representative expressly declined to pursue the case.
Direction to lower court to realize fine amounts from assets of deceased petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 489 of 2012
Surendra Kumar Dubey, son of Late Sideshwar Dubey, Resident of Bhimkanali, P.O. and P.S. Bhagmara, District Dhanbad
… … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through S.P. C.B.I. Dhanbad
… … Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
--For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rohit Sinha, Advocate
Through Video Conferencing
10/03.09.2021
U/s 409 I.P.C. (imprisonment S.I. 3 years and fine Rs. 5000 U/S 471 I.P.C. imprisonment S.I. for 2 years and fine Rs. 2000 U/s 120(B) I.P.C. imprisonment S.I. for 6 months and fine Rs. 500.
that the sole petitioner has expired. He also submits that the son of the petitioner had contacted him and instructed him that they are not interested in pursuing the case. He submits that in such circumstances, appropriate order may be passed.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Binit/
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Kumar Dubey
The State of Jharkhand through S.P. C.B.I. Dhanbad
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
