Permission was accorded to the petitioner to withdraw a criminal revision petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and an application was disposed of.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition was accorded. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 1666 of 2019
Md. Firoj Alam …. ….Petitioner
-Versus-
CORAM:-HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
…….
For the Petitioner : - Mr. Pramod Kr. Jha, Adv. For the State : - Mr. Tapas Roy, APP
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsels for the parties had no objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities were good.
05/19.08.2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal revision petition.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present criminal revision petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
I.A. No. 2703 of 2020 also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Kamlesh/
Md. Firoj Alam
The State of Jharkhand
Babi Banu
Faizan Raja
Nazmin Khatoon
Sibtain Raja
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
