Dismissed
Anil Kumar Ray v. the State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand HCCr.Rev./1087/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev.…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 1087 of 2019
Anil Kumar Ray … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mary Grace Toppo … … Opp. Parties ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Adv. For the State : APP ---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
06/11.08.2021: It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that he has no instruction from the client and as such, he does not want to press this application.
In view of the above submission, this criminal revision application is dismissed as not pressed for want of instruction.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/
Anil Kumar Ray
The State of Jharkhand
Mary Grace Toppo
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court